Embryology Research - Stem Cells, Reproduction, Transplants, Cloning

Embryology Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Embryology, including details on stem cells, reproduction, transplants, cloning.


Embryology Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Embryology

Books on Embryology

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos.

Richter KS, Shipley SK, McVearry I, Tucker MJ, Widra EA

Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA. kevin.richter@integramed.com

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate viability and implantation potential of cryopreserved blastocysts according to the day of blastocyst expansion and cryopreservation. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Private ART center. PATIENT(S): Three hundred and seventy-five patients undergoing embryo transfer with cryopreserved blastocysts. INTERVENTION(S): Blastocyst cryopreservation on day 5, 6, or 7 after oocyte retrieval according to the day of blastocyst expansion and subsequent embryo transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate (PR) per embryo transfer. RESULT(S): Clinical PRs were similar between blastocysts cryopreserved on day 5 and blastocysts cryopreserved on day 6 (32% vs. 28%). The clinical PR was lower for blastocysts cryopreserved on day 7 (15%), but this difference was not statistically significant after accounting for the number of embryos per transfer (P=.15). CONCLUSION(S): Viability and implantation potential are similar for day 5 and day 6 blastocyst cryopreservation. Viability may be reduced for blastocysts cryopreserved on day 7, but not to the extent suggested by reports of fresh transfers. These results suggest that reduced success rates associated with fresh transfers of later developing blastocysts may be the result of asynchrony with endometrial receptivity instead of poorer embryo quality.

Published 9 October 2006 in Fertil Steril, 86(4): 862-6.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Embryology Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Embryology Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (September)
  Issue 2 (October)
  Issue 3 (November)
  Issue 4 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)



Embryology Books

The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology

The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology